Prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of combined treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implants / Estudo intervencionista prospectivo para avaliar a eficácia da associação do bevacizumabe intravítreo ao implante de dexametasona para edema macular secundário à oclusão da veia retiniana

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in­­­travitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch and central retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This was a prospective interventional non-comparative study, 44 eyes of patients with naïve macular edema related to branch and central retinal vein occlusion were treated with a dexamethasone implant. Patients were followed-up at four-week intervals from the second to the sixth month. If persistent or recurrent macular edema occurred during this period, the patient was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections on an as-needed basis. The outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness changes. Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity changed from 0.97 ± 0.33 LogMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.40 at the six-month post-implant examination (p<0.00001). Improvement ≥3 Snellen lines were seen in 20 eyes (45.54%). The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 670.25 ± 209.9 microns. This had decreased to 317.43 ± 112.68 microns at the six-month follow-up (p<0.00001). The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections received in the six months post-implant was 2.32. The mean time from dexamethasone implant to first anti-VEGF injection was 3.45 months. Conclusions: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant were found to improve best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion at six months, with few intravitreal injections required.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia da combinação de in­jeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em olhos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de ramo e da veia central da retina após um único implante de dexametasona. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo intervencionista não comparativo com 44 olhos de pacientes com edema macular relacionado à oclusão de ramo e veia central da retina, sem tratamento prévio e tratados com um único implante de dexametasona, que foram acompanhados em intervalos de quatro semanas do segundo ao sexto mês. Se fosse constatado edema macular persistente ou recorrente durante esse período, os pacientes eram tratados com injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em um regime ajustado conforme a necessidade. Foram estudadas a melhor acuidade visual corrigida e alterações da espessura macular central. Resultados: A média da melhor acuidade visual corrigida mudou de 0,97 ± 0,33 LogMAR iniciais para 0,54 ± 0,40 no exame de 6 meses (p<0,00001). Vinte olhos (45,54%) melhoraram 3 linhas de Snellen ou mais. A média da espessura macular central inicial foi de 670,25 ± 209,9 μm e diminuiu para 317,43 ± 112,68 μm na visita de 6 meses (p<0,00001). O número médio de injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em 6 meses foi de 2,32 e o tempo médio entre o implante de dexametasona e a primeira injeção de anti-VEGF foi de 3,45 meses. Conclusão: Injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe após um único implante de dexametasona podem proporcionar um aumento da melhor acuidade visual corrigida e diminuição da espessura macular central aos 6 meses em pacientes com edema macular devido à oclusão de ramo e da veia central da retina, com poucas injeções intravítreas.

The effect of conbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To observe the effect ofconbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods A prospective randomized controlled clinical study.From June 2016 to June 2017,68 eyes of 68 patients with DME diagnosed in Central Theater Command General Hospital were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups:36 eyes (36 patients) in the conbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse lase group (combined treatment group) and 32 eyes (32 patients) in conbercept group (drug treatment group).All patients received three initial intravitreous injection of conbercept and re-treatment was performed according to the criteria which has been disigned before.BCVA was measured by ETDRS charts.The central macular thickness (CMT),total macular volume (TMV) were measured by Topcon 3D-OCT 2000.The BCVA,CMT and TMV in the combined treatment group and the drug treatment group were 57.9 ± 12.4 letters,427.8± 129.4 μm,10.14± 1.50 mm3 and 59.0± 16.0 letters,441.0 ±135.7 μm,10.43 ±2.10 mm3,respectively.There was no significant difference (t=0.321,0.410,0.641;P=0.749,0.683,0.524).The follow-up period was more than 12 months.The changes of BCVA,CMT and TMV were compared between the two groups.Comparison ofBCVA,CMT,TMV before and after treatment in and between groups using repeated measures analysis of variance.Results The average annual injection times was 5.8 ± 1.9 in the combined treatment group and 8.5± 2.4 in the drug treatment group.The difference was statistically significant (t=5.12,P=0.000).The BCVA in the 3rd,6th,9th and 12th month were 64.9± 11.1,65.6± 10.5,67.0± 10.8,66.6± 10.7 letters and 65.7± 15.8,66.9 ± 15.7,66.4 ± 13.0,67.3 ± 16.4 letters,respectively,and there were significant differences compared with BCVA before treatment (F=34.234,10.137;P=0.000,0.000).The CMT were 335.2± 105.9,352.6± 106.6,336.2± 120.8,305.9±97.0 μm and 323.9±92.8,325.5±90.2,327.6± 108.2,312.2± 106.8 μm,respectively.The TMV were 9.20± 1.08,9.26± 1.20,9.20± 1.63,9.05± 1.18 mm3 and 9.19± 1.21,9.35± 1.69,9.09± 1.20,8.92± 1.10 mm3,respectively.Compared with the CMT (F=12.152,12.917;P=0.000,0.000) and TMV (F=11.198,11.008;P=0.000,0.000) before treatment,the differences were statistically significant.Conclusion Conbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser and conbercept can effectively reduce CMT,TMV and improve BCVA in patients with DME,but combination therapy can reduce the injection times of conbercept.

One year efficacy of intravitreal injection with ranibizumb for macular edema secondary to ischemic and non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To compare the one year efficacy of intravitreal injection with ranibizumb for macular edema (ME) secondary to ischemic and non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Methods A total of 88 patients (88 eyes) with ME secondary to CRVO were enrolled in this retrospective study.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart.The optical coherence tomography was used to measure the foveal retinal thickness (CRT) and macular edema volume.The patients were divided into non-ischemic group and ischemic group,44 eyes of 44 patients in each group.There was no significant differences in age (t=0.650,P=0.517) and gender (x2=0.436,P=0.509) between the two groups.Compared with the ischemic group,the CRT was significantly decreased in the non-ischemic group (t=-2.291,P=0.024),and the edema volume in the macular area was significantly reduced (t=-2.342,P=0.022).All eyes were treated with continuous intravitreal injection of ranibizumab three times,and repeated injections were performed as needed.The patients without obvious ME regression after treatment were combined with triamcinolone acetonide injection.The patients with peripheral retinal non-perfusion area were combined with peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation.The follow-up was 1 year.The number of injections was counted.The changes of BCVA,CRT and edema volume in the macular area were compared between the two groups.Results During the 1-year follow-up period,88 eyes were injected 1 to 10 times,with the mean of 4.51 ±2.33.The number of injections in the ischemic group and non-ischemic group were 4.55± 1.59 and 4.48 ± 2.91,respectively.There was no significant difference in the average number of injections between the two groups (t=0.136,P=0.892).The number of acetonide injections and laser treatment in the ischemic group was significantly higher than that in the non-ischemic group (t=3.729,9.512;P＜0.001).At the last follow-up,compared with the ischemic group,the BCVA was increased (t=8.128),the CRT was decreased (t=-7.029) and the edema volume in the macular area was decreased (t=-7.213) in the non-ischemic group (P＜ 0.001).Conclusion Compared with ME secondary to ischemic CRVO,intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO has the better outcome of vision improvement and edema regression as well as less fiequent of acetonide injections and laser treatment.

Influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To analyze the influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic maeular edema (DME).Methods A total of 51 patients (51 eyes) with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this retrospective study.The general information (age,sex,body mass index,smoking history,drinking history),blood glucose indicators (duration of diabetes,fasting blood glucose,HbA 1 c),blood pressure indicators (history of hypertension,systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure),lipid indicators [total cholesterol (TC),high-density lipoprotein (HDL),apolipoprotein A (APOA)],biochemical indicators [neutrophil concentration,hemoglobin (HB),serum creatinine (Scr)] were collected.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed.CMT reduced not less than 20％ and BCVA increased by 2 lines as effective standards.Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors affecting the efficacy ofintravitreal injection ofconbercept in patients with DME.Results Univariate analysis showed that diastolic blood pressure,HDL,serum neutrophil concentration,baseline CMT and baseline BCVA were associated with edema regression (P＜ 0.05);HbA 1 c was associated with vision improvement (P＜ 0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a history of smoking (OR=0.122,95％ CI 0.017-0.887),low diastolic blood pressure (OR=0.850,95％CI 0.748-0.966),low HDL (OR=0.007,95％CI 0.000 1-0.440),thin baseline CMT (OR=0.986,95％CI 0.977-0.995) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of edema regression (P＜0.05);long duration of diabetes (OR=1.191,95％CI 1.011-1.404),high APOA (OR=l.007,95％ CI 1.000-1.013) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of vision improvement.Age,fasting blood glucose,systolic blood pressure,TC,HB,Scr and other indicators had no effect on the efficacy of edema regression and vision improvement after treatment (P＞ 0.05).Conclusions Smoking history,long duration of diabetes,low diastolic blood pressure,low HDL level,high APOA level and thin baseline CMT are independent risk factors for the treatment of DME with intravitreal injection of conbercept.

One year clinical observation of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).Methods Thirty-nine patients (39 eyes) with ME secondary to RVO were enrolles in this study.Of the patients,27 were male and 12 were female.The mean age was (41.9 ± 16.3) years.The mean course of disease was (5.0± 5.3) months.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed.BCVA was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts.Central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT.The mean BCVA was (13.4± 15.3) letters.The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was (14.1 ±2.8) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa).The mean CMT was (876.1 ±437.9) μm.Of the 39 eyes,33 were central RVO,6 were branch RVO.Patients were categorized into ischemic (18 eyes)/non-ischemic (21 eyes) groups and previous treatment (22 eyes)/treatment naive (17 eyes) groups.All eyes underwent intravitreal 0.7 mg Ozurdex injections.BCVA,IOP and CMT were assessed at 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after injection.Three months after injection,intravitreal injections of Ozurdex,triamcinolone acetonide or ranibizumab could be considered for patients with ME recurrence or poor treatment effects.Change of BCVA,IOP and CMT were evaluated with paired t test.The presence of ocular and systemic adverse events were assessed.Results BCVA,IOP significantly increased and CMT significantly decreased at 1 month after injection compared to baseline in all groups (t=3.70,3.69,4.32,3.08,4.25,6.09,6.25,4.02,5.49,8.18,6.54,5.73;P＜0.05).Two months after injection,change of BCVA,IOP and CMT was most significant (t=4.93,6.80,6.71,5.53,4.97,5.89,5.13,7.68,7.31,8.67,8.31,5.82;P＜0.05).Twelve months after injection,there was no statistical difference regarding BCVA of ischemic RVO group and previous treatment group,compared to baseline (t=1.86,0.67;P＞0.05);BCVA ofnon-ischemic RVO group and treatment naive group significantly increased compared to baseline (t=2.27,2.30;P＜0.05);IOP significantly increased and CMT significantly decreased in all groups (t=0.30,0.13,4.60,3.26,0.64,1.53,3.00,4.87;P＜0.05).Twenty-seven eyes (69.2％) experiences ME recurrence (4.5± 1.5) months after injection.Most common side-effect was secondary glaucoma.41.0％ eyes had IOP more than 25 mmHg,most of which were lowered to normal range with use of topical IOP lowering drugs.Four eyes (10.3％) presented with significant cataract progression and needed surgical treatment,all were central RVO eyes.No serious ocular or systemic adverse events such as vitreous hemorrhage,retinal detachment or endophthalmitis were noted.Conclusions Intravitreal injection of Ozurdex for patients with ME secondary to RVO is effective in increasing BCVA and lowering CMT in the first few months.Significant treatment effect could be seen at 1 month after injection and was most significant at 2 months after injection.The long-term vision of eyes in non-ischemic RVO group and treatment naive group are better.69.2％ eyes experience ME recurrence at 4 months after injection.Short term adverse events were mostly secondary glaucoma and long term adverse events are mostly cataract progression.

Quality of bevacizumab (Avastin®) repacked in single-use glass vials for intravitreal administration / Avaliação da qualidade do bevacizumabe (Avastin®) fracionado em frascos de vidro de dose única para administração intravítrea

ABSTRACT Purpose: Avastin® (bevacizumab) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody given as an off-label drug by intravitreal administration for treatment of ocular diseases. The drug's clinical application and its cost-benefit profile has generated demand for its division into single-use vials to meet the low volume and low-cost doses necessary for intraocular administration. However, the safety of compounding the drug in single-use vials is still under discussion. In this study, the stability and efficacy of Avastin® repacked in individual single-use glass vials and glass ampoules by external compounding pharmacies were evaluated. Methods: Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and turbidimetry were selected to detect the formation of aggregates of various sizes. Changes in bevacizumab biological efficacy were investigated by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Repacked and reference bevacizumab showed similar results when analyzed by PAGE. By SEC, a slight increase in high molecular weight aggregates and a reduction in bevacizumab monomers were observed in the products of the three compounding pharmacies relative to those in the reference bevacizumab. A comparison of repacked and reference SEC chromatograms showed that the mean monomer loss was ≤1% for all compounding pharmacies. Protein aggregates in the nanometer- and micrometer-size ranges were not detected by DLS and turbidimetry. In the efficacy assay, the biological function of repacked bevacizumab was preserved, with <3% loss of VEGF binding capacity relative to that of the reference. Conclusion: The results showed that bevacizumab remained stable after compounding in ampoules and single-use glass vials; no significant aggregation, fragmentation, or loss of biological activity was observed.

RESUMO Objetivos: Avastin® (bevacizumabe) é um anticorpo monoclonal inibidor do fator de crescimento endotelial de vasos (VEGF) utilizado "off-label" por meio de administração intravítrea para o tratamento de doenças oculares. A sua aplicação clínica associada ao custo-benefício do medicamento gerou uma demanda para seu fracionamento em frascos de dose única para utilização pela via intraocular. No entanto, a segurança do fracionamento do anticorpo em frascos de dose única ainda é alvo de discussão. Neste trabalho, a estabilidade e a eficácia do Avastin® fracionado em frascos ou ampolas de vidro de dose unitária por farmácias de manipulação do mercado foram avaliadas. Métodos: As técnicas de eletroforese em gel de poliacrilamida (PAGE), cromatografia por exclusão de tamanho (SEC), espalhamento dinâmico da luz (DLS) e turbidimetria foram empregadas para avaliar a formação de agregados de diferentes tamanhos. Alterações na atividade biológica do bevacizumabe foram estudadas utilizando ELISA. Resultados: Amostras referência e do bevacizumabe fracionado apresentaram resultados semelhantes quando analisado por gel de poliacrilamida. Por cromatografia por exclusão de tamanho, um pequeno aumento na quantidade de agregados de alta massa molar seguido de uma redução nos monômeros do bevacizumabe foram observados para as amostras das três farmácias de manipulação quando comparado ao referência. A comparação dos cromatogramas mostrou uma quantidade de redução do monômero inferior a 1% para todas as amostras fracionadas. Por espalhamento dinâmico da luz e turbidimetria, não foram detectados agregados de proteína na faixa de tamanho de micrômetro e nanômetro. No ensaio de eficácia, o bevacizumabe fracionado preservou sua função biológica pois apresentou menos de 3% de perda na capacidade de ligação ao VEGF quando comparado ao referência. Conclusão: Este estudo sugere que o bevacizumabe se mantem estável após fracionamento em ampolas e frascos de vidro de dose unitária pois não foram observadas agregação e/ou fragmentação de proteínas e perda de atividade biológica em quan tidades significativas.

Advances in treatment of refractory uveitic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Uveitic macular edema (UME) is a major reason of permanent visual loss. Early treatment is essential for achieving a good visual outcome, but some patients are resistant or nonresponsive to the treatment, which is called refractory UME (RUME). Intravitreous injection of glucocorticoids can improve the intraocular drug concentration and avoid systemic side effects. Immunosuppressive agents have a certain role in improving RUME by inhibiting immune cells through a variety of ways. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and new biological agents also can improve RUME outcome, but their effectiveness and safety need to be confirmed by large scale randomized clinical trials. Vitrectomy can improve RUME outcome but whether peeling of internal limiting membrane is necessary or not is still controversial. Peeling the inner limiting membrane can eliminate the potential incentive for macular edema and remove the barrier. But the process of stripping may injury the retinal neurepithelium. To eliminate edema and protect the visual function, we should analysis the causes of RUME and treat it individually.

Short-tern efficacy of conbercept versus ranibizumab for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of conbercept and ranibizumab for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)and explore the relationship between the integrity of ellipsoidal zone and visual acuity.Methods Forty-four eyes of 44 patients with macular edema in CRVO were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study.There were 15 eyes of 15 males,29 eyes of 29 females;age ranged from 49-61 years old,with an average age of (54.65±3.10) years.All patients were examined with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA),intraocular pressure (IOP),slit lamp,fundus photograph,fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA),optical coherence tomography(OCT).BCVA were examined with interactional visual chart and recorded with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution acuity.Twenty-three eyes were intravitreal injected with conbercept 0.5 mg (group A) and 21 eyes were intravitreal injected with ranibizumab 0.5 mg (group B).There was no statistical difference of age (t =-1.41),gender (x2 =0.55),the percentage of hypertension patients (x2 =0.27),average BCVA (t =-2.06),IOP (t=-2.52),central macular thickness (CMT) (t=-1.96),number of different integrity of ellipsoidal zone patients (x2 =1.00) and number of different types of macular edema patients (x2 =1.03)among the two groups (P＞0.05).The change in BCV.A.and CMT at 3,6 months between the two groups were compared.The relationship between BCVA at 6 months and BCVA,CMT at baseline were explored.The relationship between three groups of ellipsoidal zone and BCVA at baseline were evaluated.The change of BCVA after treatment between the three groups of ellipsoidal zone were Compared.The number of intravitreal injections between two groups was compared.Results During the 3,6 months after treatment,the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically difference in group A 0=5.13,7.39;P＜0.05) and group B (t=6.60,11.52;P＜0.05).There was no significant difference of BCVA at 3,6 moths between group A and group B (t=-0.99,-0.40;P＞0.05).During the 3,6 months after treatment,the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically difference in group A (t=11.58,i5.96;P＜0.05) and group B (t=18.77,35.16;P＜0.05).There was no significant difference of CMT at 3,6 months between group A and group B (t=-1.52,-1.63;P＞0.05).In both groups,BCVA at 6 months was related to BCVA at baseline (r=0.44,0.62;P＜0.05),but not related to CMT at baseline (r=0.19,0.01;P＞0.05).In the two groups,BCVA at baseline was related to the integrity of ellipsoidal zone (r=0.97,0.70;P＜0.05).There was statistical difference of the number of intravitreal injections in the two groups (t =-6.88,P＜0.05).There was no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up.Conclusions Comparing to ranibizumab,conbercept has the same effective to the treatment of macular edema in CRVO,but the number of intravitreal injections is less.The integrity of ellipsoidal zone is related to BCVA.

The efficacy of intravitreal conbercept for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To investigate the effects of intravitreous injection of conbercept for macular edema secondary to retinalvein occlusion(RVO) during 6 months period.Methods A retrospective clinical study.34 patients (34 eyes) were included in this study,who were diagnosed with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion by ophthalmologic examination,fundus photography,optical coherence tomography (OCT),fundus fluorescein angiography and other methods.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined using the international standard visual acuity chart,and the results were converted to the logMAR visual acuity.The average logMAR BCVA was 0.90 ± 0.68,and the mean macular central retinal thickness (CMT) was (672.27±227.51) μm before treatment.All subjects received intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept (0.05 ml) at the first visit.Injections were repeated based on the visual acuity changes and the OCT findings.34 eyes received 69 times of injection,the average number of injections was 2.03 ± 1.03.BCVA,OCT were examined before and after treatment using the same method.BCVA and CMT changes,drugs and treatments associated cardiac and cerebral vascular accident,intraocular pressure elevation,retinal tears,retinal detachment,endophthalmitis and other complications after treatment were observed.Linear correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline BCVA,correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline CMT,and also correlation between BCVA and CMT at different time points before and after treatment.Results At 1 week and 1,2,3,6 months after treatment,the average logMAR BCVA was 0.65±0.61,0.56±0.61,0.46±0.55,0.56±0.71,0.44±0.48 respectively.During 1,2,3,6 months after treatment,the mean logMAR BCVA were improved with statistically significant difference (Z=34.029,47.294,41.338,43.603;P＜0.05),while 1 week after treatment showed no obvious improvement (Z=21.941,P＞0.05).At 1 week and 1,2,3,6 months after treatment,the average CMT was (285.89 ± 96.69),(256.65 ± 143.39),(278.68 ± 156.92),(290.11 ± 188.17),(217.15 ± 48.04) μm respectively.At 1 week and 1,2,3,6 months after treatment,the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically significant difference (Z=68.500,98.735,93.235,91.132,109.162;P＜0.05).There was a positive correlation between the prognosis visual acuity and preoperative visual acuity (r=0.682,P＜0.05).However,there was no correlation between the prognosis vision and the degree of macular edema before treatment (r=0.078,P＞0.05).Before and 3,6 months after treatment,BCVA was negatively correlated with CMT (r=0.491,0.416,0.386;P＜0.05),while there was no correlation in other time points (r =0.145,0.217,0.177;P＞ 0.05).Systemic adverse reactions and persistent intraocular pressure elevation,iatrogenic cataract,retinal detachment,retinal tear,endophthalmitis and ocular complications were never found in the follow-up period.Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept is a safe and effective approach for RVO,which can significantly improve visual acuity and reduce CMT.

A comparative study on conbercept and triamcinolone acetoinde intravitreal injection for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion / 中华实验眼科杂志

Background Macular edema is one of the serious complications of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO),and the present therapies are laser coagulation and intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)drugs.Conbercept is humanized-monoclonal VEGF antibody and used for the treatment of retinal vascular diseases.However,fewer studies were focused on its application in macular edema secondary to CRVO.Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of conbercept with triamcinolone acetonide(TA)by intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to CRVO. Methods A non-randomized controlled study was carried out under the approval of the informed consent of patients.Sixty eyes of 60 patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were included in Weifang Yidu Central Hospital from March 2012 to August 2013.The eyes were divided into the conbercept group and TA group with 30 for each group.Conbercept and TA of 0.05 ml were intravitreally injected in different groups,and the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT)measured by OCT,intraocular pressure(IOP)and relavant complications were examined before injection and 1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months after injection.The treatment outcomes were compared intergrouply and along with time. Results The BCVA was evidently better in 1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months after injection than that before injection both in conbercept group and TA group(all at P＜0.01),and the BCVA of TA group was better than that of conbercept group 1 week after injection(P＜0.05).The CMT values of Conbercept were(572.00± 100.01),(325.12±91.55),(280.00±92.37),(258.65 ±88.65),(300.00±87.64)μm,and those of TA group were(570.00± 102.21),(345.12±89.31),(290.00±80.27),(309.65 ±84.13)and(303.00±90.59)μm,and CMT value after injection was significantly lower in 1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months after injection than that before injection both in the conbercept group and the TA group(all at P＜0.05),and CMT value was evidently reduced in the conbercept group compared with the TA group 3 months after injection(P＜0.05).The IOP was(15.20±3.52),(21.20±3.80),(26.40±4.00),(23.60±3.73)and(21.50±3.27)mmHg in the TA group before injection and 1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months after injection,showing significnatly elavation after injection(all at P＜0.05),and the IOP at different time points was higher in the TA group than that in the conbercept group(all at P＜0.05).However,there was no considerable change of IOP before and after injection in conbercept group(all at P＜0.05). Conelutions Both conbercept and TA are effective for macular edema secondary to CRVO by intravtreal injection.Compared with TA,conbercept is much safer because of less risk of IOP rising after intravtreal injection.

The effects of Atorvastatin calcium on the incidence of macular edema after phacoemulsification in diabetic patients / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To investigate the effects of Atorvastatin calcium on the incidence of macular edema after phacoemulsification in diabetic patients.Methods Forty two eyes of 42 cataract patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were divided into interventional group (23 patients) and non-interventional group (19 patients) by random number table methods.The blood glucose and pressure of patients in two groups was controlled strictly before and after surgery.10 mg Atorvastatin calcium per day was delivered one day after cataract surgery for the patients of interventional group and used for 24 weeks.No lipid-lowing agent was provided to the patients of non-interventional group.The main outcome measures included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),central retina thickness (CRT),total cholesterol (TC),low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).No significant difference was shown in the BCVA,CRT,TC,LDL-C and HDL-C in two groups before phacoemulsification surgery (t=1.251,1.257,1.031,1.042,1.461;P＞0.05).At the end of the 24 weeks after surgery,the efficacy evaluation and comparative analysis were performed.The analysis included the BCVA,the incidence of macular edema,CRT,TC,LDL-C and HDL-C.Results The BCVA was no significantly different between two groups one day after surgery (t=1.523,P＞0.05).But 4,12,24 weeks after phacoemulsification surgery,the BCVA in interventional group was better than that in non-interventional group(t=3.920,3.012,7.025;P＜0.05).24 weeks after the operation,macular edema was occurred in 2 eyes (8.69％) in interventional group and 4 eyes (21.05 ％) in non-interventional group.Significance difference was found between two groups (x2 =4.896,P＜0.05).There was no significance different of the CRT between two groups one day after operation (t=1.501,P＞0.05).Whereas,the significance difference of the CRT was occurred in two groups 4,12,24 weeks after surgery(t=4.673,7.583,9.035;P＜0.05).Comparing with that in non-interventional group,the level of TC (t =7.043,7.930,8.611) and LDL-C (t =9.374,9.554,10.856) in interventional group was significantly decreased 4 to 24 weeks after operation (P＜0.05).But no significance different of HDL-C was shown in two groups 4,12 and 24 weeks after surgery (t=1.057,1.127,1.295;P＞ 0.05).Conclusion The treatment of Atorvastatin calcium effectively reduced the incidence rate of macular edema in hypercholesterolemia patients with good glycemic and hypertension control after phacoemulsification surgery.

Focusing on the treatment of diabetic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is thickening retina with two disc diameter,which is the leading cause of blindness in diabetic retinopathy patients.The initial studies demonstrated that laser treatment of DME prevented further visual deterioration but did not improve visual acuity.Although glucocorticoid slow-release system can extend the time of effective drug concentration,to help glucocorticoid better carry out its biological effect,further studies are needed to warrant their safety due to increasing intraocular pressure and cataract progression.Novel studies identifying the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the eye with DME allowed for the development of an alternative anti-VEGF therapy,which revolutionized the management of DME by not only preventing vision loss,but also improving overall vision.Anti-VEGF therapy is becoming the first-line treatment of DME.However,present treatment modalities including anti-VEGF for DME had limitations,which build on the current understanding of DME pathogenesis.Further in-depth study of the development and outcome of DME is needed to optimize the therapeutic schemes,based on objective and scientific observation of treatment response.Finally we need to fully utilize the public health services and clinical management resources for diabetic patients,to prevent the visual impairment of DME before its occurrence.

Development, problems and prospects of the treatment of diabetic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common ocular complication of diabetes patients.It mainly involve macular which is closely related with visual function,thus DME is one of the major reasons causing visual impairment or blindness for diabetes patients.How to reduce the visual damage of DME is always a big challenge in the ophthalmic practice.In the past three decades,there are tremendous developments in DME treatments,from laser photocoagulation,anti-inflammation drugs to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.However,the mechanism of DME development is not yet completely clear; every existing treatment has its own advantages and weaknesses.Therefore DME treatment still challenges us to explore further to reduce the DME damages.